Many people like to eat corn as rice, and feel that eating corn tube is full or coarse grains.Sugar, the person who wanted to lose weight was hungry soon after eating corn, and he couldnt support the next meal at all; those who wanted to control sugar also found that eating corn is "not too good". Obviously, there is no oats and brown rice.Good effect.
What about the good sugar control sugar control weight?Is it not powerful or corn?Today, I briefly talked with friends with the needs of weight loss and sugar control: whether corn is "okay."
Corn belongs to the whole grain but not high -quality whole grains
Miscellaneous grains.As one of the traditional staple foods on our Chinese dining table, the status of corns miscellaneous grain is unquestionable.
However, corn is definitely not high -quality whole grains. It can only be said to be slightly better than fine white rice noodles.Although the content of corns dietary fiber, potassium and vitamin B2 is higher than white rice and white steamed buns, the content of corn protein, B vitamins, calcium, magnesium and potassium, and dietary fiber content can definitely not fight oats, brown rice, buckwheat, buckwheat, Quinoa and other better whole grains.
Why do you say that you use corn instead of steamed buns to not cost nutritional value in miscellaneous grains
Therefore, objective evaluation is impartial,The nutritional value of corn is relatively backward in rough grain.
In addition to the nutritional value of these corn mentioned in the previous paragraph, it is also explained that the amount of protein provided by 100 grams of steaming fresh corn kernels can provide3-4 grams less.In view of the protein quality provided by cereals, it must be included in the whole days diet protein. Therefore, from the perspective of protein, it is not cost -effective to use corn to replace rice buns.
In addition, there is a relatively niche knowledge: the calories of a large sweet corn/fruit corn, and the energy of 200 grams of cooked rice (equivalent to nearly one or two halves)Its not much worse.
Let the corn lose weight too much "hanging" glutinous corn is much higher than ordinary corn
articles about weight loss in the past may always always beA concept of popular science: When the energy we obtained through food within a period of time is less than the energy consumed by the body, the weight will be alleviated.Of course, the individual differences of physical consumption ability are very large, such as a strong "not fat" inheritance, or in a high consumption of disease.
Therefore, it is too "suspended" to hand over the heavy responsibility of weight loss to a corn. This is like letting the three -two people take the live broadcast mission of the Spring Festival Gala.
In general, it is: corn cant pick up this job, especially glutinous corn.
In several common corn -old corn, glutinous corn, and sweet corn, glutinous corn is the highest.It is also 100 grams of fresh corn kernels. The heat of glutinous corn is nearly doubled than sweet corn, which is higher than old corn.In the corn circle, it is definitely "the hottest".
Seeing this, you may say, then I pause sweet corn, relatively low energy, higher moisture content, and better taste. Was it more friendly to lose weight?
The answer is, then it depends on how you eat, what you eat, or whether the nutrient ratio you eat is reasonable, so, that, a corn cannot solve it.Declines, do not work.After all, you cant only eat corn, otherwise you will definitely be malnourished after a period of time -regardless of weight loss, protein malnutrition will not be available.
Sugar is slow to choose sweet corn, old corn glutinous corn, belongs to branches starch, not to be hungry
IntersectionThats because many sugar friends/sugar mothers eat glutinous corn with fast sugar (high glucose index GI value), not sweet corn and old corn with a slow glycemic speed and relatively low GI value.
In the starch family, the high -chain starch content is easier to digest than the high -direct chain starch content, and the speed of releasing glucose is faster, so the speed of lift blood sugar is faster.And all the staple foods that taste "glutinous" are high in starch, such as rice dumplings, dumplings, rice cakes, etc. Eating their sugar effects is comparable to sugar water!This is why a large glutinous corn belly, not only not to carry hunger, but the stomach quickly grumbled.
However, if you choose sweet corn or old corn, it is another story.Sweet corn rely on large moisture content and relatively low starch content in the unit weight. Pulling the sugar lift index in the three corn to the minimum (GI & LT; 55, which is a low sugar food).Pull the sugar speed (GI is around 55).Both are lower than the GI value of glutinous corn and strong sugar control.After all, the GI value of pure glutinous corn starch lift index is between 92-101. Even if it is directly glutinousing corn kernels, it is lower than the protein and dietary fiber, which will not be lower than white rice and white steamed buns.
Therefore, although the glutinous corn has a high rate of appearance on the market, and many people prefer to eat glutinous corn, whether from energy or rising from the ability to carry hunger, glutinousCorn is not a good choice.It also has its obvious advantages. One is delicious, and the other is to make you think that you can lose weight when you eat this kind of coarse grains. It is said that it can provide emotional value.
In summary, there are mainly the following knowledge points to you:
1. Corn is coarse grains, but not losing weight;
2. Glutinous corn is not as good as sweet corn and old corn;p ID = "34qtnbi0"> 4. The process of groaning corn is very happy and can provide emotional value.
